DSLR photometry - longer lens or tracking mount first

Affiliation
Astronomical Society of South Australia (ASSAU)
Mon, 05/18/2015 - 12:16

Hi all,

I have also recently taken the DSLR course and have been doing some work with my Canon 600D and 50mm f/1.4 lens. This combination only gets me down to about 6th magnitude. To take this further should my next step be a longer lens or a tracking mount?

Michael.

lens or mount?

Hi Michael,

I'd recommend both, but if it has to be one I'd suggest a longer fast lens. One of the following would allow reasonably long exposures and fainter targets.

EF 100mm f/2 USM

EF 135mm f/2 L USM

With a tracking mount you could go to longer lenses and longer exposures as well as time series photometry. Cheers,

Mark

Affiliation
Astronomical Society of South Australia (ASSAU)
100mm lens and tracking

Hi Michael, Mark

I'm making good use of my EF 100mm f/2 USM and Canon 1100D; thanks to Mark for the suggestion! I'm still following R Car to minimum, piggy backing on my Meade LX-90 (alt-az!) for tracking. The combination of wide-field imaging and the defocus required for DSLR photometry makes this feasible. I'm still happy to use a tripod for short exposures, but the LX-90 permits longer exposures (I've only gone to 30 seconds with stacking so far, but I'm sure I can go longer) with modest equipment that I already had available. That's a Good Thing given that I don't have much in the way of spare funds.

David

Affiliation
Astronomical Society of South Australia (ASSAU)
One step at a time

One step at a time for me. The 100mm f/2.0 looks more like my price range. I see there is also a new Samyang 135mm f/2 that is at a good price and seems to get good reviews. Has anyone had their hands on one and tried it?

Michael

Samyang 135mm f/2

Hi Michael,

I just read a review of this lens, looks interesting. Being designed for full frame sensors I expect vignetting on the APS-C sensor in your Canon 600D would be reasonable.

My only concern would be that it is a manual focus lens so no easy option for computer controlled focussing which I find really useful. Third party belt driven focussers are available but expensive. But being a manual lens you might find it has finer focus control than auto-focus lenses used manually. So it may be easier to set the required amount of defocus.

If you do end up buying a Samyang 135mm f/2 lens post a quick review on this forum to let us know how it performs for photometry. Cheers,

Mark