Skip to main content

Henden Fields for Extinction and Zero Point Calculations?

We recently released a significant update to the backend systems for the AAVSO website. While most of the bugs introduced by this update have been fixed, there may still be problems we haven't fixed. If you run into a problem, please email webmaster@aavso.org
msheald's picture
msheald
Offline
Joined: 2010-10-02

Hello! I was wondering if it would be appropriate to use Henden fields for nightly extinction and zero point values? Since I reside at latitude -24 degrees, a number of the fields pass directly overhead. I would use Landolt standards for transforms.

    Thank you for your guidance. Best regards.

Mike

Henden fields
HQA's picture
HQA
Offline
Joined: 2010-05-10

Hi Mike,

I presume you mean the fields that were calibrated at NOFS, and available through Seqplot (or perhaps the Henden/Sumner sequences)?  Stick with those that have a minimum of three nights of observation if you use them.  There are some potential systematics with using such fields for all-sky calibration, especially since -24dec fields at NOFS transit the meridian at airmass 2.5 or so.  If you are determining extinction so that you can correct the differential extinction across a field of view, then the NOFS data should be fine.  If you are using the fields to calibrate other fields, then you may get ~0.03mag offsets from the truth.

There are some useful Landolt fields that get close to overhead for you, such as PG 1323.  There is a Landolt paper with well-calibrated stars over a wide declination range that tends to get overlooked:  1983AJ.....88..853L which I recommend.

Arne

Thank you! I downloaded the
msheald's picture
msheald
Offline
Joined: 2010-10-02

Thank you! I downloaded the paper you recommended.

    Thank you for your guidance regarding the Henden NOFS fields. I appreciate it. Best regards.

 

Mike

AAVSO 49 Bay State Rd. Cambridge, MA 02138 aavso@aavso.org 617-354-0484