Naked eye nova in Scorpius or a typo??
Alexandre Amorim callas the attention to the following CBAT report:
The magnitude is given as 01.3 unfiltered. It is to be assumed that if it is an unfiltered CCD observation, the detector couldn't reach mag. 1 without saturation. My guess is that it is 10.3 instead of 01.3. Also if it was mag. 1.3 it wouldn't make sense adding a leading zero to the magnitude.
Anyway, let's see what turns out with this new object.