Blurring The Line: Non-Professionals as Observers & Data Analysts Abstract: It is well known that amateur observers are full of ability and enthusiasm. Their sheer numbers are an important solution to problems such as weather and longitudinal gaps in coverage of the sky. However, they are also sophisticated professionals with experience and expertise in many high technology areas. They are just as willing to use their computer as their telescope to help professional astronomers. We present some ideas about how to leverage this untapped resource along with some examples and best practices. Introduction: It is important to begin this discussion by redefining a popular term. What we currently refer to as an "amateur community" is actually made up of amateurs, students, retired professionals and those who hold astronomy degrees but chose to pursue careers in another field. In addition, the pure "amateurs" are amateurs in astronomy only. Most have successful careers in their own right and many have rare and valuable skills in other areas of technology. As a result, as a whole I will refer to the group as the "non-professional community" as the term amateur does not do their skills justice. The Situation Since the first eyeball looked up at the night sky astronomy has been dominated by non-professionals. Astronomy is unique in that the entire world has access to the same laboratory - the night sky. (It is a shame that that time may be coming to an end due to light pollution.) In recent history (beginning perhaps with the court church and court appointed astronomers) society has been fortunate enough to fund a few lucky individuals to devote their careers to looking at the sky. The numbers of these "professionals" ebbs and flows based on politics, economics and technological advances. Right now, thanks largely to the space age, professional astronomers abound. However, this will change in the future. Public sector spending on astronomy will likely decline in the long run as a percentage of the overall budget. In addition, new telescopes and technologies are becoming very expensive. This is having the effect of halting construction of and closing down small and medium sized observatories as universities and foundations pool their money into a few behemoth projects. Astronomy is gaining access to new technology to open up new frontiers, but it is losing a workforce. In addition, the new technology is tremendously productive and creating large amounts of data. Modern astronomical databases are becoming so large that key breakthroughs lie undiscovered. Who better to mine this data than nonprofessionals who have been identified with an affinity for and expertise in databases and computer science? At the same time, the level of technology is exploding among consumers. Consumer grade detectors now rival professional detectors in their sensitivity. Private individuals are building private meter class observatories. And the Internet has brought about a revolution in computer science that allows almost anyone with access to a computer to participate in scientific research and software development. The first two examples I present are well known and have been covered in the press quite adequately. However, the last example remains a largely untapped resource. Blurring The Line Non-professional astronomers have been doing their own data analysis for years. Any CCD observer knows they have to spend as much time reducing data as observing. Once armed with the data, their natural curiosity drove them to learn how to pull information from it. Whether it is Fourier analysis looking for periodicity, astrometry looking for minor planets or creating free software for the community they were dong basic analysis. Many have taken this a step further and been published. Some worked with a professional to get in a professional journal and some worked alone and submitted to one of the few refereed journals that accepts non-professional papers. These are the trailblazers (blazars!). A Call to Keyboards! For every trailblazer there is a large number of people who are prepared to help if they had coordination and leadership. Now is the time for the professional community to tap this resource and help solve their manpower shortage. A program that is setup to coordinate qualified non-professionals to work with professional projects would be a huge success. The American Astronomical Society's Working Group on Pro-Am Collaboration is working on creating a list of amateurs and their skills that professionals can turn to for help. This is a good start. However, to be fully effective a program needs centralized coordination and training. Non-professionals have ability, but they still need to be trained on the levels of precision needed in professional investigations. Also, managing non-professional volunteers can be very time consuming so it requires an organizational with time and patience, the latter can come from finding a resource that is truly enthusiastic about working with non-professionals. The SETI@Home project was the first serious attempt to make use of this resource. Their success illustrates the potential available to the astronomical community. However, SETI@Home was a passive project that required very little on behalf of the participant. There is much more that the community can do when properly organized. For example, imagine the building of a computer science team. This team could consist of a few programmers, a quality control professional and a technical writer. They could work together to program software a professional needs to do their work. Another example is a data mining team. A team of non-professionals could be given large stacks of data (like MACHO data for example) and told to sift through the data looking for specific information. A final example involves education and public outreach. Imagine a team that consists of a journalist, a public relations professional, and an illustrator. This team could be called upon by any professional who is about to announce a major discovery. The team could draft press releases, get them into the right hands and even illustrate it. This would give powerful E/PO capabilities to even the smallest of astronomical organizations. The plan becomes very powerful when the teams build upon themselves! For example, the computer science team could be asked to write a program that the data mining team will use to look for micro lensing effects in a large photometric database. The data mining team turns their results over to a professional, who culls through it more carefully and pulls out the real positive results. He/She rights a paper and the E/PO team puts out a press release about the project. There are many keys to success. First, the non-professionals have to be identified based on their skillset and reliability. Second, teams must be put together and trained (if needed). Third, the professional needs to clearly define the needs of the project and be avalable to answer questions from the coordinator. Finally, the team needs full ackowledgment of their contribution such as with co-authorship on any published papers. There is also an important outreach aspect of this that should not be overlooked. Each of these non-professionals are members of community distributed all over the world. What better ambassador for science than an enthusiastic volunteer that is actually participating and being part of science in action? They can be organized to give talks to local clubs, museums and talk to local newspapers about their work. The AAVSO has done this with our International High Energy Network which has given over 157 talks, papers and presentations in over 6 countries. AAVSO Examples The AAVSO has developed this methodology for work on two key projects. First, we have a team of members who are making new variable star charts and revising out old ones. This team consists of observers who sky-check the fields, data miners who cull through the various photometric databases looking for good comparison stars, a programmer who works on a database we use to keep track of all the work and a team leader who coordinates it all. Some of these volunteers do not observe at all, they just like to participate in the team! And our comparison sequence experts are so good at knowing the strengths and weaknesses of the photometric databases out there that sometimes *they* get asked questions by professionals. We have a similar team working to document every comparison star on every AAVSO chart. It is a project that is creating a giant photometric database of over 50,000 stars and will be extremely valuable to the professional community. The project is made exclusively up of non-professionals who work almost every night on it. Both teams are successful because they each have a professional who keeps an eye on activities and throws out some advice every now and then. The AAVSO is about to take this project to the next level. All 11 million+ observations in the AAVSO International Database is being validated and will be online for download by the end of 2004. In order to make sure all the data is used we will be training our members on data analsysis and mining techniques and giving them stars to investigate. We received a grant from the AAS to write three Windows-based programs (and ports that will run on Linux and OS X) which will do basic time series analysis including fourier and wavelet transforms. Summary: Non-professional astronomers hold a key for the future success of astronomy. They can help mitigate the effects of budget consolidation and increasing demands on existing manpower. The key is to effectively organize and train them to leverage the skills they acquire in their careers and apply them to astronomy. Astronomy will get an enthusiastic work force of highly skilled labor and the public will get a grassroots network of science enthusiasts. It is a win-win scenario for both. Acknowledgements: This paper is dedicated to Dr. Janet Mattei, who did as much as anyone to turn pro-am collaboration into a scientifically valid and accepted relationship.