V2361 CYG (was N CYG 05)
The following is reposted with permission from Richard Miles
(BAAVSS). It has some very interesting background and thoughts on this
object.
Possible Nova Cygni 2005 (V2361 Cyg)
This object was discovered photographically (Kodak T-Max 400) by Hideo
Nishimura on Feb 10.85 and estimated at V=9.7 (IAU Circular 8483).
Shawn Dvorak obtained an accurate CCDV mag a day or so later and myself and
Robert James have subsequently made CCDV observations since.
I have also determined V-I colors, which has shown that the object was quite
red initially (V-I = +2.4) but that it has continued to redden as the
brightness has declined. In my view it is not clear what the nature of this
object is, since it is not exhibiting typical nova behaviour.
The object fits the category of being a 'very fast' nova, in that it has
declined 3.0 mags in 9 days (t3 value). The fastest known nova has been
claimed to be V1493 Aql (Nova Aql 1999 No.1) for which the t3 value was
estimated at 5 days or so (
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0003/0003156.pdf ). Typically fast
novae exhibit t3 values of 10-20 days and rise 12-16 mags to maximum in less
than 3 days. They also tend not to show increased reddening with time due
to dust shell accumulation.
So far, the form of the lightcurve of V2361 Cyg is unlike typical very fast
novae, which peak in brightness for a day or so and then begin a rapid
decline, which then tends to slow (concave-shaped lightcurve). This object
has remained relatively constant brightness for the first 3 days but has
undergone an accelerating decline in brightness (convex-shaped lightcurve)
peaking at about 1.1 mag/day decline, which is very fast indeed.
Given, the red color, and taking account of the precise CCDV photometry
(Dvorak, Miles) the initial maximum brightness is estimated as V=10.1. Two
unfiltered CCD observations have been announced by Wakuda (9.3) and Kadota
(8.9) but these will have strongly over-estimated the brightness. The
initial I magnitude is estimated to be 7.7. The following lists the
precision photometry currently available (JD 2450000+):
JD, V Mag, V-I Color, Comments
3412.349, 10.1, -, estimated mag at discovery
3413.964, 10.132, -, Dvorak observation
3415.275, 10.278, 2.44
3416.288, 10.404, 2.46
3417.284, 10.677, 2.57
3420.293, 12.013, 3.14
3422.286, 13.70, 3.88
3423.295, 14.76, 4.12
3424.287, 15.8, 4.45, estimated V mag from measured I mag and extrapolated
V-I curve
Further observations are urgently required both photometrically using
filters (V priority) and spectroscopically to understand what is happening
here. One can speculate. For example, the nova at maximum is relatively
faint for a galactic nova and indicates that it is relatively distant (> 20
Kpc ?). However, if the reddening and rapid fade is due to the appearance
of dust at a very early stage in the outburst, the object may be unusually
reddened and therefore nearer. If the dust shell hypothesis is correct then
we can also expect the object to reach a very deep minimum and then
brighten. As to how bright the object reaches is yet to be seen but it
could possibly reach say V=13-14 if the initial outburst was significantly
attenuated and the nova is not so distant. Large telescopes will probably
be required to follow the object in the V band at minimum. However,
observation through I filters will be an alternative since at minimum the
V-I color will probably exceed +5 or +6.
How exotic this object turns out to be is yet to be seen. For example, it
may be a binary object (like DQ Her and U Sco) in which case short-period
oscillations in brightness and recurrent events may take place from which
its nature can be better discerned. We shall see.
Richard Miles
Golden Hill Observatory, Dorset, UK
Excerpt From CCD Views #331:
The new nova in Cygnus discovered on February 11, 2005 (AAVSO Alert
Notice #313) has been fading rapidly, over 5 magnitudes in the last 7
days. CCDV observations are requested through the decline and then for a
few days after it reaches minimum. This nova appears to be of the DQ Her
type, a classification with few members thus this light curve is of some
importance.
Please observe at least once per night. Observe with a V filter first.
If you can, then follow in B and Ic. Take care to get the best precision
you can.
Latest observations:
FEB 22.7870 11.30 MXL CCDI EASILY DETECTED IN SINGLE I IMAGES ERR: .06
FEB 22.7870 <15.4 MXL CCDV BASED ON 29 X 40 SEC STACKED V FRAMES
FEB 21.7952 14.76 MXL CCDV 21 X 40SEC STACKED FRAMES USED (6-CM APERTURE) ERR: .15
FEB 21.7952 10.64 MXL CCDI V-I COLOR INDEX = 4.12 +/- 0.16 ERR: .05
MXL RICHARD MILES STOURTON CAUNDLE UK
AAVSO Light Curve
AAVSO DQ Her Light Curve (1934 - 1954)
AAVSO Charts
Note the e-scale charts are for visual observers. Click on the
"V2361.seq" link under "Sequence Photometry" for V and I measures by
Richard Miles of the British Astronomical Association Variable Star
Section. We are attempting to get fainter field photometry along with
photometry in B. Go ahead and use the current measures for V and I
observations and save any B images for reduction at a later date.
Transformation
This is a very red object (V-I > 4.1) so please apply transformation
coefficients if you have them determined for your system. If you are able
to transform your data then put "Transform: Yes" in the Comments Explained
field of your observation, or click the "Transformed" button in WebObs or
PCObs.