Skip to main content

Nova designations

mrv's picture
mrv
Offline
Joined: 2010-12-21

Anyone know why most of the novae discovered this year have yet to receive permanent designations?  The GCVS staff used to do this rather quickly after each discovery but not lately.

Bob

Nova Designation
PYG's picture
PYG
Online
Joined: 2010-07-08

That's a very good question.  Might it have something to do with the lack of follow up spectra?  It can't be classed as a Nova without a confirming spectrum I believe.  

Coincidence that the death of Brian Marsden ties in with a lack of motivation in seeking out spectra for PNV's? I dunno - just thinking out aloud, but I find the current situation extremely frustrating.

It's a question that needs addressing I think!  

Gary

the lack GCVS designation, not CBAT fault
FRF's picture
FRF
Offline
Joined: 2010-08-09

Hi Gary,


The lack of GCVS designation is not a fault of the CBAT team I assume. It has nothing to do with spectra. Btw. as it was already mentioned the final GCVS designation is still missing even for spectroscopically confirmed novae too.

Nova Des.
PYG's picture
PYG
Online
Joined: 2010-07-08

Hi Robert,

I would think that a confirming spectrum plays an important role though surely.  It's only after this has been achieved that a suspected Nova becomes a real Nova.  Once this has happened, then a final designation can be given by the GCVS team.  As to why confirmed Nova haven't yet been given proper names is a mystery to me.

There is a feeling over here that Brian's demise plays some sort of role in the delay.

Gary

Supernova case
skiyota's picture
skiyota
Offline
Joined: 2010-07-24

In supernova case, situation is more difficult. There are several supernovae that has not been designated . They were reported to CBAT TOCP as supernova candidates and spectral confirmations were posted in Atel(!!). In such case, no confirmation report published in CBET . Thus such real supernovae did not have SN designation such as SN 2012xx and remain PNVs in TOCP list.
Any idea?
 

As you know, supernavae do not have GCVS neme. So, name such as SN 2012xx is usuful to identify supernovae.


Seiichiro Kiyota, Japan

inform CBAT too
FRF's picture
FRF
Offline
Joined: 2010-08-09

In case of SNe the solution is simple: instead of publishing SNe spetra only in ATEL the CBAT people needs to be informed too.

Simple, but not simple
skiyota's picture
skiyota
Offline
Joined: 2010-07-24

Yes, simple. But, It might not be simple.

I dno't know reason why some astromomers publish thier spectroscopic confirmation only in Atel. And, I don't know whether they should send thier results to both CBAT and Atel or not. I think that some negotiation is needed in professional supernova community.


I know that many cosmic distance supernovae do not have old supernova designation such as SN 2012xx and they called with supernova search project name plus number or someting like that. 

But, I think that bright supernovae, discovered by amateuers, should have name like SN2012xx.

Seiichiro Kiyota

 

 
 

AAVSO 49 Bay State Rd. Cambridge, MA 02138 aavso@aavso.org 617-354-0484