AAVSO HOME > observing > programs > pep > ssp-4 photometer report 2
 
 
 
Observing
Observing Programs
  Visual
  CCD
  Exoplanet Transit Search
  High Energy Network
  Photoelectric (PEP)
  Infrared Photometry
  Supernova Search
  Nova Search
  Eclipsing Binary
  RR Lyrae
  Sunspots and SID
  Observing Campaigns
Observing Aids
Submit Observations
Charts
 
Main sections of web
The AAVSO
Variable Stars
Observing
Access Data
Publications
Support
Education and Outreach
 
Pick a star

Create a light curve
Recent Observations
Find charts
VSX      
 

SSP-4 Photometer Observation Report and Analysis #2

By Doug West
3 June 2003

In this report I develop the relationship between the signal-to-noise (SNR) and the error in magnitude for a single five second integration with the SSP-4. The SNR is calculated from the ratio (average counts for n measurements)/(standard deviation for n measurements). Note that the standard deviation is for a single measurement not for the mean. For the observations shown in figures 1 and 2, n was seven or eight, in other words, I took seven or eight five second integrations per band. The sky background count was an average of three five second integrations. The telescope used was a Meade LX200 0.2m SCT and the observing setting is suburban. I can typically see 4+ magnitude stars naked eye near zenith. Figures 1 and 2 show the dependence of the SNR upon the magnitude of the star.

In table 1, the columns labeled “J Band SNR” and “H Band SNR” represents the average SNR that would be expected for stars with magnitudes between -2 and 4. These numbers are derived from the exponential formulas contained in figures 1 and 2. The columns with labels “J Band Error” and “H Band Error” represent the expected error (one sigma) associated with each value of SNR. The formula for calculation of the estimated error is 1.0857/SNR.

Table 1 - Estimated SNR and Error as a Function of Magnitude

  J Band J Band H Band H Band
Mag SNR Error SNR Error
-2 456 0.00 196 0.01
-1 255 0.00 148 0.01
0 143 0.01 111 0.01
0.5 107 0.01 96 0.01
1 80 0.01 84 0.01
1.5 60 0.02 72 0.01
2 45 0.02 63 0.02
2.5 33 0.03 55 0.02
3 25 0.04 47 0.02
3.5 19 0.06 41 0.03
4 14 0.08 36 0.03

A couple of general comments. I need to complete figures 1 and 2 with observations for stars fainter that 2.5 magnitude. In figure 2, the SNR drops lower than would be expected for stars brighter that 0th magnitude. I am not sure if this an observational problem or an instrumentation problem or just an odd coincidence. More observations are needed to clarify these points. In my next report I will cover color the transformation coefficients and the airmass extinction parameters.

Image 1
Figure 1 - Dependence of SNR with J magnitude.

Image 1
Figure 2 - Dependence of SNR with H magnitude.

 
  search engine |  site map |  links |  contact us