AAVSO HOME > observing > programs > solar > bulletin > feb 04
 
 
 
Observing
Observing Programs
  Visual
  CCD
  Exoplanet Transit Search
  High Energy Network
  Photoelectric (PEP)
  Infrared Photometry
  Supernova Search
  Nova Search
  Eclipsing Binary
  RR Lyrae
  Sunspots and SID
  Observing Campaigns
Observing Aids
Submit Observations
Charts
 
Main sections of web
The AAVSO
Variable Stars
Observing
Access Data
Publications
Support
Education and Outreach
 
Pick a star

Create a light curve
Recent Observations
Find charts
VSX      
 

Solar Bulletin, February 2004

Solar Bulletin

THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VARIABLE STAR OBSERVERS - SOLAR COMMITTEE
Carl E. Feehrer, Editor
9 Gleason Rd.
Bedford, MA 01730
Email: cfeehrer@hotmail.com

ISSN 0271-8480

Volume 60 Number 2February 2004

Table I. Mean Sunspot Numbers for February 2004
[boldface = maximum, minimum]
Table II. February Observers
Day N Raw Mean Ra
1 31 69 50
2 21 92 68
3 21 101 69
4 25 95 68
5 23 89 69
6 20 76 51
7 27 63 47
8 38 78 57
9 31 79 57
10 29 78 53
11 36 69 49
12 30 73 50
13 28 67 47
14 29 59 41
15 37 69 49
16 31 55 37
17 27 32 24
18 31 31 21
19 33 32 22
20 28 37 25
21 25 50 33
22 26 53 38
23 26 82 57
24 20 71 53
25 28 79 58
26 29 90 63
27 35 100 72
28 37 93 66
29 38 73 55
30 --- --- ---
31 --- --- ---
Means:29.070.250.0
No. of Observers: 65
No. of Observations: 840

Reporting Addresses

Sunspot Reports -- email: solar@aavso.org

postal mail: AAVSO, 25 Birch St. Cambridge, MA 02138
FAX (AAVSO): (617) 354-0665

SID Solar Flare Reports -- email: noatak@aol.com

postal mail: Mike Hill 114 Prospect St. Marlboro, MA 01752
17 AAP P.Abbott
22 ARAG G.Araujo
4 BARH H.Barnes
1 BATR R.Battaiola
11 BEB R.Berg
12 BERJ J.Berdejo
5 BLAJ J.Blackwell
7 BMF M.Boschat
24 BOSB B.Bose
19 BRAR R.Branch
19 BROB R.Brown
3 BURS S.Burgess
1 BXA A.Baransky
5 CAMP P.Campbell
15 CARJ J.Carlson
26 CHAG G.Morales
14 CKB B.Cudnik
12 CLZ C.Laurent
4 COMT T.Compton
24 CR T.Cragg
25 DEJV J.van Delft
10 DGP J.Dyck
17 DRAJ J.Dragesco
17 DUBF F.Dubois
13 FEEC C.Feehrer
16 FERJ J.Fernandes
17 FLET T.Fleming
24 FUJK K.Fujimori
5 GOEM M.Goetz
3 GOLA A.Golovin
29 GUNM M.Gundlach
10 HAYK K.Hay
15 HRUT T.Hrutkay
20 JAMD D.James
13 JEFT T.Jeffrey
11 KAPJ J.Kaplan
8 KHAR R.Khan
13 KNJS J&S Knight
5 KROL L.Krozel
6 LARJ J.Larriba
3 LERM M.Lerman
16 LEVM M.Leventhal
4 MARE E.Mariani
20 MARJ J.Maranon
25 MCE E.Mochizuki
15 MMI M.Moeller
17 OBSO IPS Observatory
5 RICE E.Richardson
18 RITA A.Ritchie
14 SCGL G.Schott
7 SCHG G.Scholl
5 SIMC C.Simpson
2 STEF G.Stefanopoulis
9 STEM G.Stemmler
19 STQ N.Stoikidis
26 SUZM M.Suzuki
13 SZUM M.Szulc
14 TESD D.Teske
14 THR R.Thompson
17 TJV J.Temprano
11 URBP P.Urbanski
13 VARG A.Vargas
4 VELM M.Velea
11 WILW W.Wilson
16 YESH H.Yesilyaprak

Table III. Means of Raw Group Counts (RG) and Ratios of Spots to Groups (S:G) in February   2004
Day RG S:G Day RG S:G Day RG S:G Day RG S:G
1 3.9 7.8 9 4.1 9.3 17 2.8 1.7 25 3.6 11.9
2 5.1 7.9 10 4.6 7.2 18 2.6 1.7 26 4.0 12.6
3 5.7 7.8 11 4.2 6.5 19 2.8 1.8 27 5.2 9.3
4 5.0 8.9 12 4.7 5.6 20 3.1 1.9 28 4.6 10.2
5 5.0 7.9 13 4.4 5.2 21 3.5 4.3 29 3.9 8.7
6 3.3 13.3 14 4.1 4.3 22 3.2 6.4 30 --- ---
7 2.6 14.0 15 5.4 2.8 23 4.4 8.5 31 --- ---
8 3.6 11.7 16 4.5 2.2 24 3.6 9.8 Mn. 4.4 7.3

Figure 1
Click image to enlarge.
Fig. 1. 10 cm Solar Flux and American Relative Sunspot Numbers (Ra) for February 2004
(10cm Source: http://www.drao.nrc.ca/icarus)

Figure 2
Click image to enlarge.
Fig.2 Maximum, Mean, and Minimum Ra Values for Each Month from January 2001 to Present.


Michael Hill, SID Analyst
114 Prospect St
Marlborough, MA 01752 USA
noatak@aol.com

Sudden Ionospheric Disturbances (SID) Recorded During February 2004

(Analysis performed by Michael Hill, SID Analyst)
Date Max Imp Date Max Imp Date Max Imp
040201 0608 2            
040202 0759 2            
040203 0853 1            
040203 1339 2            
040204 1119 1            
040205 0637 1+            
040205 0706 1+            
040205 0755 1+            
040208 2051 2+            
040209 0947 1            
040209 1102 1+            
040209 1405 1            
040211 1807 3            
040222 2002 1            
040225 1227 2            
040225 1622 2            
040226 0203 2            
040226 0449 1            
040226 0537 2            
040226 1420 2            
040226 2017 2+            
040226 2231 2            
040227 0851 1+            
040228 1711 1-            
040228 1728 1+            


Importance rating: Duration -1: <191: 19-251+: 26-322: 33-452+: 46-853: 86-1253+: >125

Observer Code Station(s) monitored
A Clerkin A29 NAA NAU
J Winkler A50 NAA NML NPM
D Toldo A52 NAA NPM NWC
P King A80 FTA
W Moos A84 FTA
M Hill A87 NAA
L Anderson A91 NWC
G DiFillipo A93 DHO
T Poulos A95 NAA
R Battaiola A96 DHO
J Wallace A97 NAA
P Campbell A100 NLK
F Steyn A102 NWC
B Bose A103 VTX
P Mortfield A108 NLK
A Son A112 DHO
The events listed above meet at least one of the following criteria
  1. Event reported by two or more observers within +/- 5 minutes
  2. Event matched to GOES-8 XRA event to within +/- 15 minutes and event time < 1000 UT
  3. Reported by observer with a high quality rating > 8 (scale 1-10)

SID ratings

Solar Events

February was a pretty slow month for SID events, especially in the middle of the month. Also the solar activity level was somewhat erratic with some days having a lot of activity followed immediately with days of inactivity and then active again. I wonder if this is symtomatic of this time frame within the solar cycle, kind of like the end of a particular season, when the temperatures begin to fluctuate between what is normal in one season and what is normal in the next one about to begin. As we approach minimum we are apt to see this erractic behaviour more often than not.

Observers reported only 25 correlated events this month while the GOES-12 satellite reported only 113 X-Ray flares. Of these, two were M-Class and one was an X-Class event towards the end of the month. No long duration SID events resulted from any of these flares. Overall most of the SID events had an average importance rating of 1, 1+, and 2. Thanks to all that have sent in reports. Note that if your format your reports manually, which a couple of you do, the importance rating ‘sign' comes AFTER the numerical value not before. (i.e. 1- not -1)

Solar Flare Summary
 
  search engine |  site map |  links |  contact us