[Aavso-photometry] Short-Exposure Photometry
Radu Corlan
rcorlan at pcnet.ro
Tue Jul 13 10:56:02 EDT 2004
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Michael Koppelman wrote:
> So I'm taking a look at V972 Her. It's bright, at V=6.7 or so. I did
> BRVI photometry with the following exposures times:
>
> I 10 sec.
> R 5 sec.
> V 9 sec.
> B 20 sec.
>
> The signal-to-noise ratio is really good 'cause I got lots of counts,
> so the random error is like 0.002. What's weird is the comp star
> standard deviation is really high, upwards of 0.03 in V. (This is a
> variable that, as far as I can tell, varies less than 0.1 magnitude.)
> This is usually more like 0.008 or something for me.
could it be scintillation? With a short exposure, you could have
scintillation effects if the star is not too high in the sky or the
telescope aperture is small.
Radu
>
> Is there some reason why short exposures would cause higher errors?
>
> I do not believe I am saturated. Most images have a max pixel value
> between 30,000 and 55,000 or so (on an SBIG ST-7XE). I don't think I
> should have shutter effects at exposures at 5 seconds or greater (see:
> http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/lintest/lin5.jpg ), at least not more
> than 1%.
>
> I have a little page about this star here:
>
> http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/V972Her/
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> PS - Resending this because of the discussion area downtime...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aavso-photometry mailing list
> Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
> http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry
>
--
-------------
Radu Corlan Snail Mail: Bucuresti sect. 1,
rcorlan at pcnet.ro str. Argentina nr. 28, Romania
You can still escape the "Gates" of Hell!
Use Linux!
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list