[Aavso-photometry] Short-Exposure Photometry
Dan Kaiser
dhkaiser at sprynet.com
Wed Jul 14 11:29:03 EDT 2004
Arne wrote:
>I am surprised that your exposures are this short. At 8th magnitude,
>the 1.0m saturates at about 0.5 seconds, which means you should be in
>the 5-6 second range at V for HD 209458.
I base my thoughts on previous experience with OW Gem, at mag 8.2 V. I
was saturating at 5-6 seconds and needed to defocus to reach 7 second V
exposures. If the B filter will give 2-3 x that I will be happy.
>I don't think you need to worry about guide stars. If the image wanders
>a bit on the CCD, that won't hurt, but guiding a 10-second exposure should
>not be necessary.
It has been my experience that my best photometry is when the stars stay
on the same pixels. Thus my desire to guide. However I may not have a
bright enough guide star in B, time will tell. If not I will have to
deal with it.
>This is a good event for the USA. It is difficult (total depth is 0.02mag),
>but if you can't do this one, you need to improve your techniques as all
>other potential eclipse systems are predicted to be even shallower.
I'm sure Arne meant transit systems rather than eclipsing.
Dan
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list