[Aavso-photometry] RE: DSI Pro]
Justin Pryzby
justinpryzby at users.sourceforge.net
Wed Dec 7 11:01:07 EST 2005
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:50:54AM -0800, Bruce Skelly wrote:
> I reported this to Meade.
Awesome, thanks Bruce. I would have done so myself if I owned one..
Speaking of which, I still have to update my ccdsoft to see if they
fixed any of the 5 bugs I've noticed, before rereporting them..
> I wish I had a trouble ticket number that I could refer you to, but
> I don't.
Sadly, most vendors don't have public BTS :)
--
Clear skies,
Justin
> --- Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Mr.Fabrizio,
> > > This is Nagai.
> > >
> > > I think, the DSI Pro is the good equipment.
> > > And, the AutoStar makes the FITS file.
> > > But, Photographing time is not included in the FITS file.
> > It is there, but not written properly..
> >
> > I'm looking at a file from Freddy of Netherlands, soul on IRC,
> > from some months back. It has:
> >
> > INSTRUME= 'Deep Sky Imager' / Imager Model
> > TIME-OBS= '20:31:03' / UTC Time
> > DATE-OBS= '01/10/2005' / UTC Date
> > EXPTIME = 16. / Total Exposure Time
> >
> > I suspect that the reason some software might not know the date of
> > exposure is because the new and recommended format for date of
> > observation is in the style: 2005-12-30T23:59:58.
> >
> > The exposure time is typically in seconds
> >
> > The D/M/Y format is not allowed by the FITS standard [0] for files
> > written after January 1, 2000. Also, I note that the DSI software is
> > using a 4 digit year where a 2 digit year is expected.
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list