[Aavso-photometry] RE: Crud on Filters
Michael Koppelman
lolife at bitstream.net
Sat Oct 22 10:59:54 EDT 2005
I'm using a normal 1.5" filter. I'm not sure of the thickness but the
rest of my filter are the Schuler filters so parfocal with that would
be good. It sounds like a good solution.
I sort of wonder, though, whether it would be worth it in general to
have the AR coatings. The price difference, although not
insignificant, amortized over time is not a huge deal.
Michael
On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Richard Miles wrote:
> AR-coating will certainly be an improvement but how stable they
> remain depends on a lot of factors; layer thickness, composition,
> absence or otherwise of pinholes, relative humidity in the filter
> environment, BG39/BG40 batch, etc.
>
> As I mentioned, Norman Walker can produce an optically-flat V
> filter with a 1mm silica plate cemented to the BG39 component.
> Cost for the complete filter about 100 UK Pounds.
>
> What is the diameter and thickness of the V filter you need?
>
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list