[Aavso-photometry] Possible new variable? (corrected)

[Dave Lane]

Jeff Hopkins wrote:
> What I suggest is more observations and a period determination. If you 
> can do that and predict the variations and the predictions prove out 
> then you have found yourself a variable.
And this is what I plan to do. Still struggling with how pessimistic to 
be with the error bars - the ones plotted are 2 x the SD of the 
(fainter) check star measurements (1 SD is 0.009 in B and 0.004 in V).

There has been enough discussion about error report on this list to 
split a spectroscopic binary in a Tasco, but I haven't settled on a 
recipe yet.

... Dave