[Aavso-photometry] Reality Check - Basic Concepts

[Michael Koppelman]

For this question I would say, no. The common case is people doing  
differential photometry against comparison stars without transforming  
the observations.

For people just getting started (and, in fact, people who have been  
doing this for a long time) it is by far easier to go differential  
and untransformed. With well-chosen comparison stars, the error  
introduced by not transforming is quite minor.

M.
http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/


On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:55 PM, David Trowbridge wrote:

> Question #1: In general, do the data points in this light curve  
> represent
> the results of observers who have been doing all-sky photometry and  
> using
> standards such as Landolt, M67, etc?