[Aavso-photometry] Determination and use of BVRI transformation coefficients with Maxim DL

[Brad Walter]

NO maxim doesn't do the Transformation. You have to use a spreadsheet. I
stopped using Maxim for photometry because of it's limitation. It won't give
you the raw instrumental magnitudes (-2.5*LOG(netcounts/seconds) and if you
use more than 1 comp star it forces them to have equal weighting The output
file doesn't give you net count or S/N info or airmass info in the output
table. All you get are the magnitudes in columns delineated as ref1, ref2,
etc., check, Obj1, obj2, etc. and a column with a sequentially assigned
image number.
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:34:51 -0500
From: "Arne Henden" <arne at aavso.org>
Subject: Re: [Aavso-photometry] Determination and use of BVRI
	transformation	coefficients with Maxim DL
To: "Lionel Catalan" <lcatalan at lakeheadu.ca>
Cc: aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
Message-ID:
	<9c3d14ae0801120834ie93a2b5i1b4a7d398dc52e61 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Jan 12, 2008 10:46 AM, Lionel Catalan <lcatalan at lakeheadu.ca> wrote:
> Following the procedures outlined in the AAVSO CCD variable star 
> manual, I determined the colour transformation coefficients (Tbv, Tvr,
> etc) and the terms Qbv, Qvr, etc for my system by taking sequential 
> exposures of M67 with B, V, R and I filters. Since all the stars were 
> in the same frame and the elevation was high, I did not include first 
> order or second order extinction coefficients in my analysis. Maxim DL 
> requires that I select a reference star and set its magnitude to 
> calculate the magnitude of all the other stars in a given frame.
> Therefore, the determined numerical values of the terms Qbv, Qvr, Qri 
> and Qvi are dependent on the particular reference star that I 
> selected. If I now want to use my colour transformation coefficients 
> for another star field, I assume that my values of Tbv, Tvr, etc would 
> still be valid, but I wouldn't be able to use the same reference star, 
> and therefore I would have to recalculate values of Qbv, Qvr, etc 
> based on some standard star in the new field. Does this make Maxim DL 
> innapropriate or at least inconvenient for using transformation 
> coefficients?
>
It is clumsy, but ok.  You just select one of the sequence stars for that
new field as your "reference star", and use your Tbv etc.
with respect to the magnitudes that are returned by MaxIm.
In general, you can do the color-correction transformation on any field,
whether conditions are photometric or not.
When doing this kind of differential photometry, where you are actually
calculating something like

Vstar = (vins_star - vins_comp) + Vcomp

what happens is that the zeropoint is constant for both stars, and the
subtraction will remove it from the solution.  You can see the full
derivation in my old book, Astronomical Photometry.

Does MaxIm actually apply the coefficients, or are you using ancillary
software (like an Excel spreadsheet) to do the transformation?
Arne


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Aavso-photometry mailing list
Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry

End of Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 50, Issue 20
************************************************