[Aavso-photometry] Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 52, Issue 6

[Kate Davis]

Hi Jerry,

If you send an email to aavso at aavso.org your request should be directed 
to the correct staff member. In the case of WebObs' issues, that is me. 
So feel free to email directly as I check that email more frequently 
than I see discussion group messages.

I am sorry for the inconvenience. The Feb. 29 Bug is now fixed. Let me 
know if you have any other questions.

Best,
Kate


aavso-photometry-request at mira.aavso.org wrote:
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Feb 29 Bug (hudsonjk at astound.net)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:22:03 -0000
> From: <hudsonjk at astound.net>
> Subject: [Aavso-photometry] Feb 29 Bug
> To: <aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org>
> Message-ID: <001501c87f0f$56aa7db0$64dcea42 at LittleDevil>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="Windows-1252"
>
> Hi -
>
> I just tried to submit some observations via WebObs for CCD obs.
>
> I tried entering the dates
>     2008/02/29/...
> and also 
>     2008/03/00/...
>
> and got error messages.  In the first case, the complaint was that February only has 28 days (!), the other wanted me to use a number in range 1..31 for March.
>
> Don't know if this is the forum for airing this, so forgive me if it isn't.  I tried sending to 
>     observations at aavso.org
> but that obviously isn't the right place.
>
> Don't worry about the problem, I was able to use J.D. format to get around the problem.
>
> - Jerry Hudson (HJA)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aavso-photometry mailing list
> Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
> http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry
>
> End of Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 52, Issue 6
> ***********************************************
>
>