[Aavso-photometry] Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 52, Issue 6

[hudsonjk at astound.net]

Kate -

Thanks for the info.  I'll know better where to send problems. 
"Observations" was obviously not the place! And I probably shouldn't have 
used the discussion group to mention it.  As I said, it wasn't really much 
of a problem, but thanks for fixing it.  Now, I'll have to be sure to 
observe on Feb. 29, 2012 to check out your fix!!!

I don't know whether it is your project or not, but I think the chart-maker 
is a work of art.  I like being able to say which way North is, and 
prescribe the exact field of view.  The web site as a whole is pretty 
friendly.

Thanks again,

Jerry Hudson (HJA)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kate Davis" <kate at aavso.org>
To: <hudsonjk at astound.net>
Cc: <aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 52, Issue 6


> Hi Jerry,
>
> If you send an email to aavso at aavso.org your request should be directed to 
> the correct staff member. In the case of WebObs' issues, that is me. So 
> feel free to email directly as I check that email more frequently than I 
> see discussion group messages.
>
> I am sorry for the inconvenience. The Feb. 29 Bug is now fixed. Let me 
> know if you have any other questions.
>
> Best,
> Kate
>
>
> aavso-photometry-request at mira.aavso.org wrote:
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Feb 29 Bug (hudsonjk at astound.net)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:22:03 -0000
>> From: <hudsonjk at astound.net>
>> Subject: [Aavso-photometry] Feb 29 Bug
>> To: <aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org>
>> Message-ID: <001501c87f0f$56aa7db0$64dcea42 at LittleDevil>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I just tried to submit some observations via WebObs for CCD obs.
>>
>> I tried entering the dates
>>     2008/02/29/...
>> and also 2008/03/00/...
>>
>> and got error messages.  In the first case, the complaint was that 
>> February only has 28 days (!), the other wanted me to use a number in 
>> range 1..31 for March.
>>
>> Don't know if this is the forum for airing this, so forgive me if it 
>> isn't.  I tried sending to observations at aavso.org
>> but that obviously isn't the right place.
>>
>> Don't worry about the problem, I was able to use J.D. format to get 
>> around the problem.
>>
>> - Jerry Hudson (HJA)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aavso-photometry mailing list
>> Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
>> http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry
>>
>> End of Aavso-photometry Digest, Vol 52, Issue 6
>> ***********************************************
>>
>>