[Aavso-photometry] Differential vs. absolute magnitudes
Jeff Hopkins
phxjeff at hposoft.com
Sat Mar 8 16:42:18 EST 2008
Hi Gianluca,
You cannot increase your precision by adding a B filter. You might be
able to increase your accuracy, however.
Things seemed a lot clearer back in the single channel photometry
days. Most people did all-sky photometry for determining their
transformation coefficients and for special projects and differential
photometry for most other projects. Everyone transformed their data
and accounted for extinction.
A word of caution, absolute magnitudes are the magnitudes of stars at
a standard distance from the star (10 parsecs or 32.6 light years).
Naturally you cannot determine that directly using photometry. I
think what you are referring to is the star's published or standard
magnitude/extraterrestrial magnitude as seen from outside the Earth's
atmosphere. Star magnitudes are usually expressed that way.
With CCDs many programs let you enter a comparison star's magnitude
and then the difference between it an the program star can produce a
normalized magnitude for the program star. With practice you can
increase the precision of that magnitude, but not the accuracy. To
increase the accuracy you must use a standard filter and transform
the data. If the stars are far apart you must also allow for
extinction. The zero points will drop out as they are the same for
both the comparison star and program star.
Good luck.
Jeff
At 13:35 -0700 03/08/2008, gianlucaros at gmail.com wrote:
>I have been doing some differential CCD photometry with a V filter.
>Since I would like to increase precision I am thinking of buying a B
>filter and to use transformation coefficients. Reading the AAVSO
>manual I haven't a clear picture on how to trasform differential
>magnitudes into absolute one. Once the data have been transformed
>using transformation coefficients, shall I calculate zero point to get
>the absolute magnitudes? What is the procedure? Are absolute
>magnitudes only possible with all sky photometry or all sky photometry
>is compulsory only if the comparisons stars are more than a field
>apart? I am getting a bit confused.
>
>Gianluca (RGN)
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Counting Photons
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
(623)849-5889
(623) 247-1190 (Fax)
www.hposoft.com
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list