Naked eye nova in Scorpius or a typo??

Dear all,

Alexandre Amorim callas the attention to the following CBAT report:
http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/followups/J17320840-4357306.html [1]

The magnitude is given as 01.3 unfiltered. It is to be assumed that if it is an unfiltered CCD observation, the detector couldn't reach mag. 1 without saturation. My guess is that it is 10.3 instead of 01.3. Also if it was mag. 1.3 it wouldn't make sense adding a leading zero to the magnitude.

Anyway, let's see what turns out with this new object.

Cheers,
Sebastian