From: "Pamela L. Gay" > work on the goals first, > and then the model and then the projects. May I suggest a > discussion of these points? > > 1. What are the outstanding E/PO challenges in astronomy right now? > 2. Define committee goals that address those challenges in some way. > 3. Plan realistic projects to meet the goals. > > The main part that has been missing is #1 and I bet we all have > different opinions > about it. But we need to reach a consensus on that if we want our > #2 goals to be > effective. > > I'm a little worried about this: > >> education within the AAVSO, and I need to prepare a document that >> defines specific goals in terms of X new members, Y observations by >> students, and Z new professionals (educators and astronomers) brought >> into collaborations and traces out projects to use to meet these >> goals. > > Is the council suggesting that all projects bring in X new > members, Y observations and Z > new professionals? If not, why do they want that as a definition of > our goals? To me > that's a marketing job, not a job for an E/PO committee. Our goals > should be based on the > needs of the community and our plans should reflect the combination > of those needs with > the resources we have available. If XYZ happens, great. But, in my > opinion, it should > not be a primary or even secondary goal of the committee. > > We also need the scope of the committee defined. For example, are > we restricted to > variable star work or can we work on anything in astronomy? Is the > organization expected > to invest money and/or HQ resources into this or is this driven/ > funded solely by the > committee members? > > Aaron > _______________________________________________