Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. AAVSO Observing Campaigns - Update by Dr. Matthew Templeton
3. Book Reviews by Kate Hutton
4. From Binoculars to Telescopes: A Personal Journey by Richard "Doc" Kinne
1. INTRODUCTION
Years are moving past quickly, perhaps faster than we would like.
Summer, fall, spring, winter... To observe the inspiring changes
throughout seasons just add up to our appreciation for nature. We are
thrilled to have our observers, members, our contributors and our
readers along this joyful ride we call 'life'.
Warm weather is not the only thing arriving in the northern hemisphere!
For the AAVSO, quite a bit is in store. We expect a wonderful summer and
hopefully a productive one as well.
Although we don't have as many articles in this issue, the ones that we
are lucky to have are inspiring with a scientific flavor too, and they
make for wonderful reading.
We are grateful to all our contributors, and we would welcome your
contributions, too. As always, please send us your comments and
questions.
Have a wonderful summer or winter!
Thanks, and good observing!
Gamze Menali, AAVSO Technical Assistant
2. AAVSO OBSERVING CAMPAIGNS
By Dr. Matthew Templeton
It has been a very busy year for AAVSO campaigns, and the observer
community has done a fantastic job of providing data for the many
astronomers doing research in variable star astronomy. There have been
twenty campaign announcements issued since my last campaign recap in the
May 2007 issue, and just like your observations, the data requests keep
coming in. And of the eight campaigns currently active, four of them
strongly encourage the participation of visual observers! (Please visit
our campaigns page for the
details!)
Visual observers have a tremendous advantage over instrumental observers
when it comes to quickly estimating and recording the brightness of a
star. An experienced observer familiar with a given field and sequence
can make a variable star estimate in just a few moments, while
instrumental photometry with a CCD camera or photoelectric photometer
requires additional time to download and process images and reduce the
photometric measurements. For some campaigns, those few moments can be
precious, and so visual observers have an important role to play in many
of the AAVSO campaigns we run.
Currently we have four campaigns that involve monitoring of transient or
outbursting objects and providing rapid notification to professional
astronomers using large telescopes for follow-ups. Many of the physical
changes in an outbursting variable can occur in seconds, minutes, or
hours, and the sooner astronomers can train their instruments on target,
the more they can learn. As an example, we are providing support for
Dr. Bradley Schaefer (LSU) for a long-term monitoring project of the
recurrent nova U Sco. Dr. Schaefer has predicted that nova outbursts
may be preceeded by precursor events, and has requested that observers
around the world monitor this star during the next year (it is predicted
to go into outburst in the first half of 2009). Visual observers can
quickly and efficiently monitor this field by simply checking the
variable's position against the faintest comparison star you're capable
of reaching. U Sco is near 20th magnitude in quiescence, so really all
you need to check is "do you see it or not?" That's it! (And if you do
see it, let us know right away!)
We also just finished a large campaign series for Dr. Paula Szkody (U.
Washington, and AAVSO President) to monitor six faint dwarf novae in
support of Hubble Space Telescopes. Again, these were all faint
sources, but in the event they went into outburst, the light could
damage the sensitive cameras on HST. Several visual observers provided
fainter-than estimates in support of this campaign, and all of the HST
observations were conducted as scheduled with no interruptions.
Finally, we just launched a year-long campaign for Dr. Steve Howell to
monitor a set of large-amplitude dwarf novae -- the "tremendous outburst
amplitude dwarf novae" or "TOADs". Dr. Howell is hoping to see changes
in the infrared light emitted by these objects as a consequence of
superoutbursts. He'll be using the Spitzer Space Telescope and needs
the AAVSO's help in monitoring his list of stars. Many of these stars
are visible to some visual observers during quiescence, so some of you
may be able to contribut observations throughout the entire cycle.
Others are very faint, and so fainter-than observations will be used for
those. If and when any of these objects go into outburst, we'll begin
intensive observations to see whether it is a true "superoutburst", and
if so, the object will be added to Spitzer's observing schedule over the
coming 8-12 weeks.
AAVSO observing campaigns are important collaborations between amateur
observers and researchers, and are yielding important scientific
results, while making efficient use of limited observing time on large
telescopes. All of these projects have to be set in motion with one
observation, and it could be yours that does it. Please visit the AAVSO
campaigns page, linked on the sidebar of our homepage, and see if there
are any projects you would like to contribute to. Every observation
really does matter!
3. BOOK REVIEWS
By Kate Hutton
BOOK REVIEW: Cosmic Catastrophes: Exploding Stars, Black Holes, and
Mapping the Universe (2nd edition) by J. Craig Wheeler, 2007 Cambridge
University Press.
In keeping with the title, the through-going theme of this book is
supernovae. In support of this theme, the range is wide: stellar
evolution, quantum physics, some particle physics, relativity, white
dwarfs, neutron stars & pulsars, accretion disks, black holes, gamma ray
bursts, dark matter, dark energy, wormholes, string theory, and so on.
There is not a single equation, although there is a thorough discussion
of multi-dimensional space & some topology. There are also a plethora
of clever & helpful illustrations. A great deal of information is
packed into a small book, however, all of it explained in Wheeler's
extremely lucid fashion. The book is up to date as of the publication
date, even on topics that are so far unresolved among specialists.
Cosmic Catastrophes originated from & is used in a science class for
non-science majors, but definitely not for dummies. In this book, I have
found one of the clearest explanations of the accretion disk
instability, implicated in dwarf nova outbursts, that I have found
anywhere. Five or six thumbs up for this one!
As an aside, Wheeler has also written a very entertaining sci-fi novel
called The Krone Experiment, involving the CIA, a mad scientist & an
artificial black hole on the loose.
BOOK REVIEW: An Introduction to the Study of Variable Stars by Caroline
E. Furness, published in 1915 by Riverside Press, reprinted recently (no
date given) by Kessinger Publishing.
As far as I can tell, this book is a time machine. Read it & you will
travel back to the days when comparison star magnitudes may have come
from the Bonner Durchmusterung, no constellation yet had 334 variables
in it, a photometer was device that allowed a visual observer to adjust
an artificial light source or an image of Polaris to match the program
star & delta Cephei was held to be some odd kind of binary system
(although Shapley's revolutionary assertion that it pulsates is
mentioned). Much attention is paid to the methods of careful observing
& record keeping that went into Argelander's BD & other catalogs of the
era, meticulous methods that would drive us from the computer age to
distraction. Mention is made that Harvard Observatory had recently
converted to the practice of writing the comparison star magnitudes
directly onto the charts. Reading this book has really caused me to
appreciate our roots & also our chart & sequence teams all the more!
Interestingly, the book already contains a hint of the era to come: a
chapter devoted to "photo-electric photometry"!
Reading this book also pointed me to how far we have come, in slightly
less than one century, in the understanding of the stars themselves. In
1915, no nova progenitors had been found in the plate collections. SS
Cygni and U Geminorum were totally baffling. Eclipsing binaries, even
the beta Lyrae types to some extent, were understood fairly well. But
all short-period variables, including Cepheids, were considered to be
spectroscopic binaries, since they showed radial velocity changes.
Stellar evolution was still conceived as going from "early" to "late"
spectral type.
Amateurs of the day were very much encouraged to participate, via the
quoted words of Argelander, Pickering, and the editors or Popular
Astronomay. In the "Hints for Observers" chapter, there is a brief
summary of the founding of the AAVSO (did you know that in 1914, there
were 35 members who contributed 14,506 observations of 255 variables?).
In spite of the many changes in the study of variable stars over the
last century, some things ... such as CV alert networks ... never change: "
... as Mr. Knott wrote on one occasion to Mr. Baxendell: 'I was greatly
amused at receiving your telegram this morning about half an hour after
I was starting one to you, and one to Espin, respecting our friend U
Geminorum.'"
4. FROM BINOCULARS TO TELESCOPES: A PERSONAL JOURNEY
By Doc Kinne, KQR
Observing variable stars, as we all know, can be an increasing
challenge. That's part of the fun, in fact! Some of us rise in several
levels during our variable star observing career - from naked eye
observation to binoculars to telescopes to CCDs.
Due to the similarity with how our eyes and binoculars work there is
usually not a great amount of problem moving from naked eye observation
to using binoculars. Yes, you do have to learn your way around the sky
(which can be great with binoculars), and you do have to go through
learning about differential photometry with comparison charts, of
course. But you have to do that with naked-eye variable star astronomy
as well. Given all of that, the nice thing about observing with
binoculars is "what you see is what you get." There is no confusion
about the star field being in the "wrong" orientation, and the field you
see in your binoculars is usually large enough that you can recognize it
in the sky.
This is how I started, and my first recorded observation was via 7x50
binoculars of Z UMa. My Z UMa observation simultaneously showed me both
the thrill of variable star observation, and the limitation of
binoculars.
The limitation with binoculars, of course, is their light gathering
ability. I would look at star after star and a vast percentage of them
were either below 7th magnitude in brightness, or at least has a minimum
that went significantly below that. I wanted to follow the more numerous
fainter stars, and that meant a telescope. Telescopes offer more
challenges to the beginning observer, but the increase in light
gathering power is worth it.
The first challenge I found myself dealing with was a greatly reduced
field of view. With binoculars you can see almost half of the bowl of
the Big Dipper. With that kind of a large field to see "guide stars" in,
you can usually zero in on your star without too much trouble. With a
telescope and its greatly reduced field of view I found myself
developing expertise in an activity called "star hopping." Star hopping
is when you acquire an easily found star in the general area of your
target. From that initial star you "hop," or "walk," your scope's field
of view to your desired star. You find the initial star, then move the
scope slightly to the direction of the next nearby known star, then
again, and again, until you find yourself at your target. Star hopping
will not only enable you to find your targets, but I found it really
acquaints you with your star's area of the sky.
With most people using reflecting telescopes of one kind or another,
including myself, the next challenge in making the leap form binoculars
to telescopes was dealing with "flipped fields." In this instance, with
telescopes, what you see is not what you get. Even more disconcerting,
until you get used to it, is that the telescope field moves exactly in
the opposite direction that you'll expect. This motion is probably the
largest difference between binoculars and telescopes. Once you get used
to this, the rest will be significantly easier. This, I think, was my
biggest challenge.
With telescopes you'll be using AAVSO charts of "B" scale or higher. You
must remember that the "B" charts and higher are made to show you how
your field will look in your telescope - flipped over and turned around
from the actual sky. This is where your brain must be backward because
the challenge here it to remember that if your target star in your field
of view is above and to the right, you need to nudge your telescope down
and to the left.
If you have a Cassagrain telescope you'll be using the "reversed"
charts. Here, in your field of view, the sky has been turned around, but
not flipped over.
No matter what your scope, I found that if I always made a point of
nudging my telescope slowly I could evaluate if the movement I was
making was really in the direction I wanted to go.
Remember that magnification is a non-consideration with variable star
observing. It's all about the mirror size in this game. When I got my
telescope a few years before I got into variable star observing I never
thought that I'd go for lower magnification, but I keep looking at those
super-wide field of view eyepieces every time I look at an Orion
catalog. The bigger the field you can see, the more valid comparison
stars you'll be able to use.
Finally, as you are beginning your transition from binoculars to
telescopes, make your first several telescopic observations outside of
the galactic plane. Stay away from the Milky Way. I was surprised how
many additional stars the scope picked up, especially in those
environments, and until you get used to your new field of view and the
orientation of your telescope, you won't want a whole forest of stars
confusing you.
Variable star astronomy is a journey. Some may elect to stop at
binoculars and with appropriate stars there is nothing wrong with that.
Good work can be done with binoculars. However, most of us bitten by the
variable star bug will, sooner or later, find ourselves moving a bit
further down the road and starting to observe from a telescope. I found
that they are very different instruments, but mastering the telescope
for variable star observing will give you benefits both for your
variable observations in particular and your knowledge of the sky and
astronomy in general.
EYEPIECE Views is published bimonthly and when circumstances warrant via
e-mail. An Eyepiece Views archive is available online.
Please send comments and suggestions to gamze @ aavso.org.
You may subscribe or unsubscribe from Eyepiece Views on our website.
Good observing!
Gamze Menali,AAVSO Technical Assistant (MGQ)
Copyright 2008, American Association of Variable Star Observers