|
|
|
|
Variable Star Of The Month
September, 2001: WZ Sagittae
(2003+17)
WZ Sge is in Rare Superoutburst!
 | WZ Sge went into a rare outburst on July 23, 2001. At bottom right, star
appears about 1.5 mag. fainter as on Aug 10.8 UT. Credit: Gianluca Masi, Bellatrix Astronomical
Observatory - Ceccano (FR), ITALY, web
page | WZ Sge - the prototype of the WZ Sge subclass of dwarf nova cataclysmic
variables - went into a rare outburst on July 23, 2001 (see AAVSO
Alert Notices 286 and 287) captivating the attention of amateur and professional astronomers around the
globe. This outburst of WZ Sge has been monitored extensively by the astronomical community; with numerous
satellite or ground-based observing campaigns already carried out, underway, or scheduled for the coming
weeks and months. Since reaching maximum visual magnitude of approximately 8.0 on July 23-24, WZ Sge
declined to about magnitude 10.7 by August 15. Then, after some anticipation, it began a dramatic "dip" of
2 magnitudes with a fast recovery (see Alert Notice 287) on
August 16-17. The star faded to approximate magnitude 12.9 by August 18-19, and by August 21 had recovered
to visual magnitude about 10.7. Since then it has been fluctuating between magnitudes 10.7 and 12.7.
Figure 1 is a composite light curve showing the current outburst and the 1978 superoutburst of WZ Sge. It
appears that this outburst is closely mimicking that of 1978! Presently there have been over 18, 300
observations submitted to the AAVSO during this outburst alone. The composite light curve is being updated
daily on the AAVSO WZ Sge outburst update web page where you will also find curves of CCD runs on the WZ Sge
superhumps, and other interesting links concerning this rare superoutburst.  | Click image to enlarge Figure 1: AAVSO composite light curve of the
1978/2001 outburst (updated 8/31/01) | A Little History WZ Sagittae has had three recorded outbursts prior to the current
one. The first maximum recorded occurred on November 22, 1913 and was discovered by J. Mackie while
examining the Harvard photographic plates (Leavitt and Mackie 1919). The nova reached a maximum of
magnitude 7.0 photographic. Named "Nova Sge 1913", the star was quiet for the next 33 years. It erupted
again in 1946, discovered this time by Kurt Himpel, at the Heidelberg Observatory, in Germany on the night
of June 28-29. During this outburst, WZ Sge climbed from 12th to 10th magnitudes in only 4 hours, reaching
a maximum of 7.2 photographic on June 29, 1946. Following the outburst in 1946, WZ Sge was thought to be a
recurrent nova. Since recurrent novae are roughly periodic, in 1978, observers of the AAVSO kept a close
eye on WZ Sge in anticipation of another outburst. J. Bortle, who is one of the close followers of this
variable, had observed it fainter than magnitude 14.5 on November 28.99 UT, 1978. Due to bad weather,
however, he could not resume observations for three nights. On December 1.1 UT, 1978, 32.4 years after the
second outburst, J.T. McGraw at the University of Texas discovered WZ Sagittae at visual maximum of about
8.0 magnitude (Patterson 1978). McGraw's discovery telegram on December 1 sparked an intensive worldwide
effort to observe the star both spectroscopically and photometrically.  | Figure 2: Outbursts of 1913, 1946, and
1978 Click image to enlarge | Figure 2 shows the mean light curves of the three
outbursts in the history of WZ Sagittae. The light curves for 1913 and 1946 have been constructed from the
photographic data published by Mayall (1946) and Campbell (1947). The daily means of the 1978 outburst are
from visual and photoelectric (V) observations. The optical behavior of WZ Sge in general is similar during
the three outbursts. It is interesting to note that both during the 1946 and 1978 outbursts a sharp decline
in brightness took place about 30 days after maximum. A similar behavior is seen with the most recent
outburst. One major difference between the 1946 and 1978 outbursts of WZ Sge is that, in the former, WZ
Sagittae continued to decline after the abrupt fading, whereas during the outburst in 1978 it recovered
within four days and oscillated for about 32 days before its gradual decline. This may be due to the lack
of data for the 1946 outburst since the decline and recovery is fast, if there is no continuous data
it would be easy to miss. The 2001 outburst appears to be most similar to the 1978 outburst; it is
displaying this "dip" in brightness and currently appears to be oscillating by about two magnitudes.
WZ Sge Makes a Name for Itself There are four
types of non-magnetic cataclysmic (eruptive) variables: novae (see GK Per, Novae),
recurrent novae (see RS Oph), dwarf novae (see SS Cyg, U Gem, Z Cam, SU UMa ) and
nova-like objects. WZ Sge was originally classified as a nova because of its large amplitude outburst in
1913. Then, with the recurrence of large amplitude (~ 8 mag) outbursts of intervals of about 33 years (1913
and 1946), WZ Sge was re-classified as a recurrent nova. Photometric studies conducted during the quiescent
periods of WZ Sge, however, revealed an orbital period of 81 minutes and 38 seconds, a short orbital period
that is not usually seen in recurrent nova. In addition, through spectroscopic observations made during the
1978 outburst, it was proved that WZ Sge displayed characteristics more similar to a dwarf nova than a
recurrent nova. The spectra showed a mostly featureless continuum at maximum similar to the U Gem variables
instead of broad emission bands and P Cyg absorptions that are seen with recurrent novae (S. Ortolani et
al., 1979). Observations of the 1978 outburst also revealed photometric light variations in WZ Sge called
"superhumps". These superhumps are the defining characteristics of SU UMa type dwarf novae and so WZ Sge is
considered the prototype for a subset of these SU UMa type stars. Dwarf Novae: WZ Sge and SU UMa, like
all cataclysmic variables, are close binary systems consisting of a late-type star that fills its inner
Lagrangian surface (stability limit for two components) and transfers material onto an accretion disk formed
around the companion white dwarf. The region where the stream of ejected material strikes the disk is
called the "hot spot". It is interactions within the disc that give rise to "normal" outbursts typically
seen in dwarf novae. Currently, the most favored theory that explains these outbursts is the,
"Disk-Instability Model". In this model, the mass transfer from the secondary is relatively constant, but
the accumulated gas in the outer portions of the disc give rise to thermal instabilities which cause matter
to be accreted onto the white dwarf which then causes an outburst. SU UMa stars: SU
UMa stars are a type of dwarf novae that exhibit two clearly defined distinguished types of outbursts, a
short outburst called a "normal outburst" (due to thermal instabilities within the disc as described above)
which lasts for a few days and long outbursts called "superoutburst" which lasts typically for two weeks or
so. SU UMa stars have short orbital periods, in almost all cases, below the "CV period gap" (between 2 and
3 hours) and they exhibit the periodic photometric light variation called "superhumps" during and only
during superoutbursts (Osaki, Y. 1995). The mechanism behind superoutbursts, may be explained by the
"thermal-tidal instability model" (Osaki 1996). In this model, in addition to thermal instabilities within
the disk, a tidal instability also occurs. Physical processes cause the disk radius to expand until it
reaches a critical radius whereby a 3:1 resonance is achieved and tidal instabilities produce the
superoutburst, which returns the disk back to its "normal" size. For more information on SU UMa stars
visit the VSOTM for SU UMa. WZ Sge stars:
 | Click image to
enlarge Distribution of supercycle lengths among SU UMa stars. Credit: Hollier, C. (2001) Ch.6, p.88,
Fig.6.14 | The period of time from one superoutburst to the next is called the
"supercycle". The supercycle lengths of the known SU Uma stars are mostly around a few hundred days, but a
few systems have much shorter or much longer supercycles. The short-supercycle systems have become known as
ER Uma stars, while the long-supercycle systems are called WZ Sge stars. ER Uma stars typically spend a
third to half their time in superoutburst, with a supercycle of only 20-50 days. When not in superoutburst
these stars show frequent "normal" oubursts - about one every 4 days. In contrast, WZ Sge stars have
supercycles that last decades, while normal outbursts are few and far between. WZ Sge itself has had a
superoutburst at intervals of about 33, 32, and 23 years, and it has never been seen to undergo a normal
outburst. Other WZ Sge type stars include AL Com and EG Cnc which have superoutburst intervals of
approximately 20 years. The approximately 30-year supercycle length that WZ Sge displays is the most
inactive group of the SU UMa type stars. The factor determining the different timescales appears to be
mass-transfer rate. WZ Sge stars have a very low mass-transfer rate, perhaps only 1012 kg/s.
Given the slow rate of mass-transfer, it would then take decades to accumulate enough material for a
superoutburst. The puzzle of these stars, however, is why they show few or no normal outbursts during this
interval. Even with a low mass-transfer rate, material should accumulate, drifting viscously into the inner
disc, and trigger an outburst. One suggestion for why this does not occur is that the disc viscosity is
very low. The material would then remain in the outer disc, where much more can be stored before an outburst
is triggered. The problem with this idea, however, is to explain the extremely low viscosity level.
Another possible explanation involves the removal of the inner disc, to prevent outbursts starting there.
This could occur through "siphons" or because of a magnetic field on the white dwarf (Lasota et al. 1995,
Warner et al. 1996, Hameury et al. 1997, Meyer-Hofmeister et al. 1998, Lasota et al. 1999). What Causes Superhumps? During the 2001 superoutburst of WZ
Sge, significant superhump activity was recorded by AAVSO observers and several good examples of these light
curves can be found on the WZ Sge page. Superhumps are the hump-shaped modulation that appears during
superoutburst. The period of the humps is a few percent longer than the orbital period. They continue
until the star returns to quiescence, although their period usually drifts to slightly shorter periods and
smaller amplitudes over time.  | | Superhump light curve of WZ Sge during
the 2001 superoutburst. Photometry by AAVSO Observer, Lew Cook (COO). |
The following description is from C. Hellier, 2001: Nicholas Vogt was the first to
propose that superhumps were caused by the disc becoming elliptical during superoutburst. He suggested that
such a disc would precess, meaning that the direction in which the disc was elongated would gradually
rotate, on a timescale much longer than the orbit (in the same way, the axis of a spinning top precesses,
but more slowly than it spins). The long precessional period of the disc would then interact with the
orbital cycle to create a new periodicity - the superhump. To see this, consider the secondary lining up
with the elongated radius of an elliptical disc, which precesses with a period of a few days. One orbital
cycle later, the secondary would again be in the same place, but the elongation would have moved on
slightly, so the secondary would have to continue a little further before they again lined up. Any
interaction between the two (such as the mass-transfer stream interacting with the disc) would thus occur at
a slightly longer "superhump" period that can be considered the beat period between the orbital and
precessional periods. Is that a spiral I
see?  | Image of the
accretion disk in WZ Sge during the first week of its superoutburst, derived from optical spectroscopy.
(Click image to enlarge.) Credit: Dr Danny Steeghs, University of Southampton (WZ Sge web page) | During the
first week of WZ Sge's recent superoutburst, D. Steeghs and T. Marsh of Southampton University; E. Kuulkers
of the Space Research Organization Netherlands and Utrecht University; and W. Skidmore of the University of
St. Andrews, on behalf of a larger collaboration, report the detection of strong spiral waves present in the
accretion disk of this system (see IAUC
7675). This is the first time that spiral arms have been detected in WZ Sge and they are encouraging
follow-up spectroscopy to track the evolution of the structures.
A Call for Observations As mentioned in AAVSO Alert Notice 287, observers are requested to continue to
monitor WZ Sge throughout the rest of this very rare superoutburst and particularly after the star returns
to minimum (in the 1978 superoutburst, it took about 3 months after the dip for WZ Sge to return to
minimum). Both visual and particularly CCD observers are urged to continue to monitor it for superhumps by
making observations every 3 to 5 minutes for several hours; be sure to report the time to 4 decimal places
of the Julian Date. Extremely fast CCD photometry (less than 1 minute exposure to exposure, preferably less
than 30 seconds) in the last stages of the superoutburst and after return to minimum has been urged by Dr.
T. Marsh, University of Southampton, UK. Here is a web page of
Dr. T. Marsh's complete request for observations. AAVSO Preliminary charts are available for observing
WZ Sge as well as precision photometry of the comparison stars. Please
report your observations to AAVSO Headquarters, making sure to indicate which comparison star(s) you used.
WZ Sagittae, which is believed to be near the end of its lifetime as a cataclysmic variable (Robinson et
al. 1978), challenges both the observers and theoreticians who are trying understand the behavior and
evolution of these stars. - AAVSO WZ Sge outburst update web page
- Gianluca Masi's WZ Sge web page
- Campbell,
L. 1947, Popular Astronomy, 55, 220.
- Green, D. IAU Circular No. 7675, July 31, 2001.
- Hameury, J.-M., et. al. "A
Model for WZ Sge with 'Standard' Values of alpha", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 287, 937-940, 1997.
- Hellier, C. "Chapter 6: Elliptical Discs and
Superoutbursts", Cataclysmic Variable Stars: How and Why they vary, Springer-Praxis, London, 2001,
75-95.
- Lasota, J.P. et al. "Dwarf
novae at low mass transfer rates", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 302, L29-L32, 1995.
- Lasota, J.P. et al. "WZ Sagittae as a DQ Herculis star." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 305, 473, 1999.
- Leavitt, H.S. and Mackie, J.C., Harvard College Observatory
Circular, No. 219., 1919.
- Mattei, J.A. "Variable Star Notes." Journal of the Royal
Astronomical Society of Canada, 74, No.1, 1980, 53-55.
- Mayall, M. "Nova Sagittae 1913,
another recurrent nova." The Astronomical Journal, 52, 1947, 127-128.
- Mayall, M.W.,
Bulletin of Harvard College Observatory, No. 918, 3, 1946.
- Meyer-Hofmeister, E., et al. "WZ
Sagittae - an old dwarf nova." Astronomy and Astrophysics, 339, 507-517, 1998.
- Ortolani, S., Rafanelli, P., et. al. "The Recent Outburst of the Dwarf Nova WZ Sagittae." Astronomy
and Astrophysics, 87, 1980, 31-35.
- Osaki, Y. "The Disk Instability Model of SU Uma
Stars: Connection Between the SU Uma Stars and the WZ Sge Stars." Cataclysmic Variables, A. Bianchini et al.
(eds.), 1995, 307-313.
- Patterson, J., McGraw, J., et al. "A Photometric Study of the Dwarf Nova WZ
Sagittae in Outburst." The Astrophysical Journal, 248, September 15, 1981, 1067-1075.
- Robinson, E.L., Nather, R.E. and Patterson, J., Astrophysical Journal, 219, 168,
1978.
- Skidmore, W., Mason, E., et al. "Investigating the structure of the accretion disc in WZ Sge
from multiwaveband time-resolved spectroscopic observations - I." Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 318, 2000, 429-439.
- Warner, B., et. al. Dwarf
nova outbursts in truncated accretion discs: down with low alphas", Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 282, 735, 1996.
- Warner, B. 1976 in IAU Symposium 73, "The
Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems", ed. P. Eggleton, S. Mitton, and J. Whelan. p.85
This month's Variable Star of the Month was prepared by Kate Davis, AAVSO Technical
Assistant, Web.
|